Case study must be a minimum of 3 full pages of original discussion and analysis, not counting the title page, reference page, figures, tables, and appendixes. The statements in each Ca
Case study must be a minimum of 3 full pages of original discussion and analysis, not
counting the title page, reference page, figures, tables, and appendixes. The statements in each
Case Study must be supported by at least 1 scholarly reference, cited throughout the narrative
and placed on the reference list in the APA format. Organize content under Level 1 headings.
CASE INFORMATION AND QUESTIONS ATTACHED
Criteria Ratings Points
Topic, domains and concepts
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
Clearly addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates all domains, comprehensive in content, uses terms and concepts from reading, demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years, correctly cited throughout the narrative.
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
Addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates most domains, discusses content, uses terms and concepts from reading, and demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years, cited at least once in the narrative.
28 to >0 pts
Developing
Does a poor to fair job of addressing the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates some domains, discusses content, does not use terms and concepts from reading, does not demonstrate clarity of expression. Statements are not supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years and cited in the narrative.
0 pts
Not Present
Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to provide the required content.
35 pts
Work Habits
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Superior work in all areas. Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Good work in most areas. Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Poor to fair work in most areas. Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
0 pts
Not Present
Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of work.
30 pts
Personal application
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The student provides thorough applications as a result of his/her professional life.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The student provides good applications as a result of his/her professional life.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The student provides poor to fair applications as a result of his/her professional life.
0 pts
Not Present
The student provides zero applications as a result of his/her professional life.
5 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Formatting
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
APA format followed, organizes content under APA headings, no large filler quotes, clearly does not plagiarize, clearly finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. APA-formatted reference list and in-text citations are included.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
APA format followed most of the time, headings contained some errors, has no large filler quotes, does not plagiarize, finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. Reference list and in-text citations contain 2 – 5 errors.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
APA format inconsistent throughout; missing headings; some large filler quotes; does not plagiarize; finds few supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study; reference list, in-text citations, and headings contain more than 5 errors.
0 pts
Not Present
APA format was not followed; large filler quotes present; does not plagiarize; does not find supportive reasons in reading or apply them in the case study; reference list and in-text citations are not included.
10 pts
Spelling, Grammar and Mechanics
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Case Study begins with a title page and was typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts on all pages; all pages were double-spaced; 1-inch margins on all four sides were used. Correct grammar and punctuation were present throughout. Correct spelling and spacing were present throughout. The paper was typed in a formal style and written in the third person.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Some errors with the title page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Some errors with errors with one or more of the following were present: • Grammar, and/or; • Punctuation, and/or, • Spelling, and/or; • Spacing. Some errors with formal style and/or third person were present. 1 – 3 errors were present.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant errors with the title page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; align text left; extra spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Significant errors with one or more of the following were present: • Grammar, and/or; • Punctuation, and/or, • Spelling, and/or; • Spacing. Significant errors with formal style and/or third person were present. More than 3 errors were present.
0 pts
Not Present
Errors with spelling, grammar, and/or mechanics were so pervasive that the readability and level of scholarship of the paper were substantially reduced.
10 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Page count
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
At least 3 complete pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
At least 2.9 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
7 to >0 pts
Developing
2.0 – 2.8 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
0 pts
Not Present
Less than 2 pages submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
,
Utility Concerns in Choosing an Assessment Method
Randy May is a 32-year-old airplane mechanic for a small airline based on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. Recently, Randy won $2 million in the New England lottery. Because Randy is relatively young, he decided to invest his winnings in page 603a business to create a future stream of earnings. After weighing many investment options, Randy chose to open up a chain of ice cream shops in the Cape Cod area. (As it turns out, Cape Cod and the nearby islands are short of ice cream shops.) Randy reviewed his budget and figured he had enough cash to open shops on each of the two islands (Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard) and two shops in small towns on the Cape (Falmouth and Buzzards Bay). Randy contracted with a local builder, and the construction/renovation of the four shops is well under way.
The task that is occupying Randy’s attention now is how to staff the shops. Two weeks ago, he placed advertisements in three area newspapers. So far, he has received 100 applications. Randy has done some informal HR planning and figures he needs to hire 50 employees to staff the four shops. Being a novice at this, Randy is unsure how to select the 50 people he needs to hire. Randy consulted his friend Mary, who owns the lunch counter at the airport. Mary told Randy that she used interviews to get “the most knowledgeable people possible” and recommended it to Randy because her people had “generally worked out well.” While Randy greatly respected Mary’s advice, on reflection some questions came to mind. Does Mary’s use of the interview mean that it meets Randy’s requirements? How can Randy determine whether his chosen method of selecting employees is effective or ineffective?
Confused, Randy also sought the advice of Professor Ray Higgins, from whom Randy took an HR management course while getting his business degree. After learning of the situation and offering his consulting services, Professor Higgins suggested that Randy choose one of two selection methods (after paying Professor Higgins’s consulting fees, he cannot afford to use both methods). The two methods Professor Higgins recommended are the interview (as Mary recommended) and a work sample test that entails scooping ice cream and serving it to a customer. Randy estimates that it would cost $100 to interview an applicant and $150 per applicant to administer the work sample. Professor Higgins told Randy that the validity of the interview in predicting overall job performance for customer service employees is r = .30, while the validity of the work sample in predicting overall job performance is r = .50. Professor Higgins also informed Randy that the selection ratio is probably fairly high because there are not a lot of job seekers and because the minimum wage he plans on paying is not likely to attract people in this area.
Randy would really appreciate it if you could help him answer the following questions:
1. What parts of this information seem most important for the choice of selection measures? How does each piece of information fit with the “choice of assessment method” discussion?
2. If Randy can use only one method, which should he use?
3. If the number of applicants for these jobs increases dramatically (more applications are coming in than Randy expected), how will your answers to questions 1 and 2 change?
4. What are some additional pieces of information you would like to have before committing to any of these options? What other criteria might be relevant?
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
Is it hard to Place an Order?
1. Click on the “Place order tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER INFORMATION" section and click “PRICE CALCULATION” at the bottom to calculate your order price.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
Need help with this assignment?
Order it here claim 25% discount
Discount Code: SAVE25